Legal Opinion

United States v. Nevers

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1993No. 92-2600PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:

This case calls for the Court to determine whether the federal conflict-in-interest statute is unconstitutionally vague. Defendant Nevers, a trade specialist for the United States Department of Commerce, attempted to persuade a potential Commerce Department client, Murray Studley, to grant World Consultants International (“WCI”) the exclusive right to sell Studley’s products abroad. Because Nevers knew that his wife had a financial interest in WCI, Nevers was indicted for and convicted of violating the conflict-in-interest statute. Nevers appeals his conviction. Finding…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Manuel Flores, United States of America v. Juan Raul GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. GaytanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Daniel M. Paradies, the Paradies Shops, Inc., Paradies Midfield Corporation, Ira JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. SteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API