Legal Opinion
Lazarz v. Brush Wellman, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-5681PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
The case involves multiple counts, pleading sexual harassment and discrimination as well as a number of other causes of action. Before the Court is the motion of defendants Brush Wellman, Inc., and David Nichols to dismiss the instant action for failure to state a claim, or, in the alternative, to grant summary judgment. After careful review of the motion and its accompanying documents, 1 the response thereto by plaintiff, and the reply briefs filed by both sides, the Court concludes that summary judgment is appropriate on four of the eleven counts…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lillian Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc. Lawrence A. Gross Donna J. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Kanzler v. RennerWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Jean Anderson Hierarchy of Agents v. Allstate Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- McGrenaghan v. St. Denis SchoolDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Kahn v. American Heritage Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.