Legal Opinion

Canty v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1939No. 3 Div. 293PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The indictment, trial and conviction were for murder in the first degree.

The indictment on which appellant was tried was in the following language: ■“The Grand Jury of said County charge, that before the finding of this indictment Dave Canty, unlawfully, and with malice aforethought, killed Eunice Ward by beating or cutting her with some instrument, a further description of which is to the grand jury unknown, against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama.”

Said indictment was sufficient under the Code form. It avdrred that “some instrument” was employed in beating or…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Hornsby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Boyle v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Moulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Lyons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. BryantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API