Boyle v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, Justice
(after stating the facts as above).
A grave question presented on this appeal is whether the defendant was due an affirmative instruction on his plea of “not guilty by reason of insanity.”
The burden and measure of proof of insanity in such eases is defined by statute (Code-1923, § 4572) as follows: “Every person over fourteen years of age charged with crime is presumed to be responsible for his acts, and the burden of proving that he is irresponsible is cast upon the accused. The defense of insanity in all criminal prosecutions shall be clearly proved to the reasonable satisfaction of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Parrish v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Bachelor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Ex Parte TrawickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Nobis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Huey R. Lee v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Seibold v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Reedy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.