Legal Opinion

United States v. David B. Pasquantino, United States of America v. Carl J. Pasquantino, United States of America v. Arthur Hilts, A/K/A Butch

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 18, 2003No. 01-4463, 01-4464, 01-4465PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINS and Judges WIDENER, WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD joined. Judge GREGORY wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL joined. .

OPINION

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge:

David Pasquantino, Carl Pasquantino, and Arthur Hilts (collectively the Defendants) were convicted of using interstate wires for the purpose of executing a scheme to defraud Canada and the Province of Ontario of excise duties and tax revenues relating to the importation and sale of liquor. According…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Pasquantino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. John Fountain, Also Known as Chick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. William JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. BurseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Mark LandersmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API