Legal Opinion

Missouri Electric Light & Power Co. v. Carmody

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Pembrook R. Elitoraet, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

The defendant in error sued the plaintiff in error in the circuit court, city of St. Louis, upon the following contract:

“This agreement, made and entered into this first day of November, 1893, by and between P. J. Carmody, of St. Louis, Missouri, party of the first part, and the Missouri Electric Light and Power Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Missouri, party of the’second part, witnesseth; that
“Whereas, the party of the first part is the lessee of buildings located at 215 North Sixth street, 513 North Sixth street, and 724 Olive street, and is desirous of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anchor Milling Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Faxon v. HollisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  3. Seligman v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Taylor v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Robinson v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hancock v. CrouchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Nye-Schneider-Fowler Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  3. United Shoe Machinery Co. v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Leach v. BoppMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API