Andreyko v. City of Cincinnati

Gorman, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, John Andreyko, appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of defendants-appellees, the city of Cincinnati and the board of trustees of the Cincinnati Retirement System (“CRS”) 1 , on Andreyko’s claims that the creation of two classes of nonuniformed employees seeking prior service credit — one purchasing credits at a subsidized cost and the other bearing the full cost — violated his constitutional right to the equal protection of the laws. See Section 1983, Title 42, U.S.Code. Andreyko argues that there was no rational basis for…