Legal Opinion

State ex rel. La Follette v. Kohler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Counsel for the relators have made a motion for the advancement of this cause upon the calendar so that it might be set down for argument at the December, 1930, assignment. Upon the argument of the motion it was suggested that a decision of this case after January S, 1931, would be a decision upon purely moot questions. Counsel *353for both parties requested the court to determine at this time whether a decision after January 5, 1931, would become moot in order that the arduous and unnecessary labor incident to the preparation and presentation of the case might be saved. It is apparent upon a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Olson v. CunninghamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State ex rel. La Follette v. KohleeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Ice & Coal Co. v. LuethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Workers' Union, Local 248Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Hernandez v. McConaheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Town of Menasha v. City of MenashaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. ZischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API