Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Kinman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 20, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

Where a married woman has been injured, can her husband maintain an action for the loss of the aid and service of her society, she having been compensated for her personal injuries and her physical pain and suffering?

While Neat Kinman and his wife, Nancy, were at appellant’s station at Sparta, Ky., awaiting the arrival of a passenger train that would convey them from Sparta to Elliston Station, a station truck was hit by a passing train and thrown against Mrs. Kinman, seriously injuring her. The proof tended strongly to show that her injuries were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marri v. Stamford Street Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  2. Feneff v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. McElwainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  4. Mathewson v. MathewsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  5. Hansford's administratrix v. Payne & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. GosserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  2. Commercial Carriers, Inc. v. SmallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Broaddus v. WilkensonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. City of Paducah v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. McGuire v. East Kentucky Beverage Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API