Page v. Something Weird Video
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
PAEZ, District Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This diversity action arises out of the alleged misappropriation of plaintiff Bettie Page’s (“plaintiff’ or “Page”) “likeness” in the recent advertising of home video cassettes for two films in which she starred in the 1950s. 1 The films starring Page were made in New York when Page was employed by Irving Klaw. The rights to these films were sold or assigned to defendants.
Until recently, the films…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bell v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Keimer v. Buena Vista Books, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Rezec v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Pooley v. National Hole-In-One Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000
- Perkins v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.