McIlrath v. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wright District Court. — How. S. M. Weaver, Judge. Action to recover under an insurance policy for dainag'e to plaintiff’s crops caused by a hail storm. Verdict for plaintiff. From judgment thereon, defendant appeals. — -
1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.
1 This action involves a claim for loss due to the same storm as that referred to in an action against this, same defendant, which has already been before this court. Barry v. Association, 110 Iowa, 433, and Barry v. Association, 114 Iowa, 186. No new questions of any importance are presented, and the ease may be-briefly disposed of. Appellant contends that no evidence of the amount of loss was admissible, because the bylaws of the company provide that, in case of disagreement as to the amount of the loss, it shall be settled by arbitration, the result of which shall be binding upon both…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Barry v. Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Barry v. Farmers' Mutual Hail Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kahuku Plantation Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- Whitney Estate Co. v. Northern Assurance Co. of LondonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Glandon v. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Ass'n of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933