Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Flowers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 1, 1901No. Appeal, No. 188PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal, No. 188, Jan. T., 1900, by-defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., June T., 1892, No. 480, on bill in equity for partition in case of Americus Lancaster, Trustee for Josephine L. Flowers and Anna F. Richardson, and the said Josephine L. Flowers and Charles T. Richardson, and the said Anna F. Richardson, his wife, in right of said wife, v. Ann Eliza Flowers et al. Bill in equity for partition.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 188, Jan. T., 1900, by-defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., June T., 1892, No. 480, on bill in equity for partition in case of Americus Lancaster, Trustee for Josephine L. Flowers and Anna F. Richardson, and the said Josephine L. Flowers and Charles T. Richardson, and the said Anna F. Richardson, his wife, in right of said wife, v. Ann Eliza Flowers et al. Bill in equity for partition. Arnold, P. J., filed the following opinion: George Flowers (1st) died October 6, 1839, seized of the real estate which is the subject of the present proceeding in partition. He left a…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:,

Upon a careful examination of the testimony in this case, and upon due consideration of the arguments made in it, the decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge of the court below.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jefferson Bank v. Progressive Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Reiff v. PepoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Holbrook's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Bell v. SageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Lancaster v. FlowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API