Herzing v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.
A judgment in favor of Miss Herzing for “compensation” as for total permanent disability and in a “lump sum” (under the Workmen’s Compensation Law) was reformed in a particular and affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 9 S.W.(2d) 457. Writ of error was allowed each party on application presenting questions to be noticed.
1. In the statute (article 8306, Rev. St. 1925, §§ 15 and 15a) it is provided.
“In special cases where * * * manifest hardship and in justice, would otherwise result,” the insurer may be compelled to “redeem * * * liability by payment of a lump sum as may be determined.”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Consolidated Underwriters v. SaxonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. BehnkenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Travelers' Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Georgia Casualty Co. v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. StephensTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. BrockTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. BeckworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Petroleum Casualty Co. v. BristowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.