Legal Opinion

Benson v. Brown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 2, 1920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Des Momes Municipal Court. — O. S. Franklin, Judge. The trial court allowed the appellee a recovery for certain extras. -Defendant, Brown, appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

í pleading-failure to plead toppei. — I. The plaintiff furnished “extras.” It seems to be conceded that it is entitled to pay for them, either from defendant Brown or his lessee, the O ’Dea Hardware Company. After plaintiff and defendant Brown had rested, and before the hardware company had adduced any testimony, it moved a directed verdict, except as to shelving lumber, amounting to $29.67, the partition lumber, of $5.88, and the pro rata work done upon the various items of lumber under that heading. The motion urged: (1) That the evidence shows conclusively that, aside from the excepted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co. v. GarmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Volquardsen v. Davenport HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. F. E. Marsh & Co. v. Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Estherville Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Iowa Electric Light & Power Co. v. HoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. R. Lee Tolley Co. v. MarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API