Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Sullivan

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1911No. Crim. No. 223PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPLICATION for discharge upon writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner was committed to the custody of the chief of police on account of nonpayment of a fine imposed by a police judge in a certain proceeding wherein petitioner was charged with cohabitation and adultery with a married woman named. The affidavit of complaint upon which the proceedings before the police court were based charged .that, on a day named, in the city of Los Angeles, “the crime of adultery and cohabitation was committed by Francis A. Sullivan (petitioner herein), who at the time and place last aforesaid did willfully and unlawfully live with one Corinne Royse in a…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re KasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. In Re CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. CaseOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. Qui Mei LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. George v. BeatyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API