Legal Opinion

Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co. v. Pittsburgh Reduction Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York

Decided October 22, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. 8uit for infringement of patents. On final hearing!

1Opinion of the Court

HAZED, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity by the Electric Smelting & Aluminum Company against the Pittsburgh Reduction Company to restrain the infringement of two United States letters patent for a process of separating aluminum and for a process of obtaining metals from their ores or compounds by electrolysis. The patents are owned by the complainant under several mesne assignments. The original application for patent was filed by Charles S-Bradley, February 23, 1883; on December 8, 1891, patent No. 464,933 was issued on a division of the original application; and on February 2, 1892,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. The Incandescent Lamp PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Malleable Castings Co. v. Buckeye, Malleable Iron & Coupler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  2. De Long Hook & Eye Co. v. Francis Hook & Eye & Fastener Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API