Legal Opinion

National City Bank of Mobile v. Barret

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 22, 1928No. 1 Div. 472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is the third appfeal in this cause. A statement of the case appears on first appeal. National City Bank v. Barret, 214 Ala. 35, 106 So. 168.

Confining ourselves to such further statements as deemed proper to present discussion, we observe the suit is in Alabama between parties residing here, growing out of transactions in this state, touching lands located in Mississippi.

The bill is based on allegations that a deed made by Mrs. Kate W. Barret and her husband, B. T. Barret, with option to repurchase taken in the name of Barret Bros. Shipping Company, Inc., and assigned to-Mrs. Barret, was,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lamkin v. LovellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Lester v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Staples v. BarretSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Clark v. SeagravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Russell v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Files v. SchaibleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. First Alabama Bancshares, Inc. v. McGaheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Head v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. People's Bank v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. National City Bank of Mobile v. BarretSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API