Legal Opinion

United States v. Friel

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 5, 2006No. Criminal 06-25-P-HPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

HORNBY, District Judge.

1. Objections to Magistrate [Judge] Cohen’s Denial of Motions and to His Participation in General (Docket Item 154-)

The objections are Overruled. Magistrate Judge Cohen is acting within his statutory authority, 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2000), and the Local Rules of this Court. The rulings he has made on nondispositive matters are neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Fed.R.Crim.P. 59(a). On Judge Cohen’s dispositive recommendations, I have made an independent de novo review, and I adopt his conclusions as my own. Fed.R.Crim.P. 59(b). I also…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. United States v. Jean M. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API