Legal Opinion

Weston v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 28, 1945No. 15716PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice Stukes

delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court:

This appeal is closely allied with that reported under the title of Murray v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 193 S. C., 368, 8 S. E. (2d), 314, 317. The insured and the insurer are the same. In that case this court said:

“To sustain this ruling, the principle is invoked that an examination of the insured by a physician chosen by the insurance company is some evidence of one of two things: Either that the alleged disease did not exist, or that its existence was known to and waived by the insurer. Nix v. Sovereign Camp,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Killian v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Cohen v. . N.Y. Mutual Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Ramsey v. Old Colony Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Henderson v. Life Ins. Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Brownlee v. Charleston Motor Ex. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Arnold v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. Blackwell v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Parker v. Progressive Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  5. Bolick v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API