Legal Opinion

Estes v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 24, 2016No. 02-14-00460-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, CHIEF JUSTICE

In ten issues, appellant Russell Lamar Estes appeals his convictions for five counts of sexual assault and two counts of indecency with a child by contact. He argues that a statutory provision that made his sexual assault convictions first-degree felonies rather than second-degree felonies is unconstitutional as it applies to him, that the trial court committed error during voir dire by sustaining the State’s objection to a question that he posed to the jury panel, that the trial court abused its discretion by excluding certain evidence and by admitting…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. Donald Ray Wells v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2017
  3. Hodge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Senn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Russell Lamar Estes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API