Legal Opinion

Columbia National Bank v. Stine

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1932No. 30,457PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an action on a promissory note to recover a balance of $135 with interest where the note was regularly indorsed to the plaintiff bank as collateral security. The plaintiff was found by the jury to be a holder in due course, having acquired it before maturity, but the general verdict was for the defendant and judgment was accordingly rendered for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals, urging particularly that instruction No. 7 given by the court was erroneous and a misstatement of the law applicable to the case.

The case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farmers' State Bank v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. Bank of Claflin v. RowlinsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  3. Cedar Rapids Savings Bank v. ZeffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. HeilmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API