Legal Opinion
Crespo v. Stapf
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 21, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
242 N.J. Super. 254 (1990)
576 A.2d 346
NELSON CRESPO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSEF STAPF, JOSEF STAPF MASCHINENBEAU, BETTFEDERENBEAR-BEITUNGSMASCHINEN, SCHACHNE FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER AND DOWN PRODUCTS, INC., PURO DOWN INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY, CORPORATION, PURO INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY CORP., JOHN DOE, (FICTITIOUS) AND ABC COMPANY, (FICTITIOUS), DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Hudson County.
Decided March 21, 1990.
Renee Steinhagen of the New York Bar, argued the cause for plaintiff (Ball, Livingston & Tykulsker, attorneys).
Angela A. Iuso argued the cause for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority v. McCraneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Coons v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Lemke v. BaileySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crespo v. StapfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Crespo v. StapfNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Crespo v. StapfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Ragan v. DukesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992