Legal Opinion
Harris v. Artuz
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 14, 2004No. 03-2675PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Appellant Christopher Artuz appeals the district court’s grant of a writ of habeas corpus to state prisoner Keith Harris based on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. See Harris v. Artuz, 288 F.Supp.2d 247 (E.D.N.Y.2003). In reviewing a district court’s grant of a habeas petition, we examine the court’s legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error. See Hemstreet v. Greiner, 367 F.3d 135, 138 (2d Cir.2004). We assume familiarity with the pleadings and the his*57tory of proceedings, including the state courts’ rejections of Harris’s direct appeal,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Louis Eze v. Daniel A. Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Velazquez v. PooleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Green v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Llanos v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Turner v. DzurendaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Hilario-Bello v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022