Legal Opinion

The Arabien

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 9, 1925No. Nos. 17130, 17186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KERRIGAN, District Judge.

In each of these libels recovery is sought of the value of certain merchandise, which libelants claim was delivered to and accepted by the steamship Arabien at San Francisco, for transportation to Japanese ports. Only a right in rem has been asserted, and these proceedings therefore are to foreclose purported liens on the vessel. Respondents’ answers deny the delivery and acceptance, and also deny any agreement for transportation.

It appears that on September 18, 1917, the Steamship Company Orient chartered the Arabien at a lump rental to the American Asiatic Company,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Pollard v. VintonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
Osaka Shosen Kaisha v. Pacific Export Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
Bulkley v. Naumkeag Steam Cotton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
J. K. Armsby Co. v. Actieselskabet Dampskibet IslandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
The BlandonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Celio v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941