Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Northrup

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wexford. (Aldricb, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

One Eli H. Salisbury made affidavit in behalf Of plaintiff, and procured the issue of a writ of replevin against the defendant. The requisite bond was also filed. On the return-day of the writ, Salisbury appeared for plaintiff. .The defendant answered in person, and moved to dismiss the writ, because plaintiff’s full Ohristian name did not appear in affidavit, writ, or declaration. The justice returns that he asked Mr. Salisbury if he could amend, and insert full Ohristian name of H. 0. Fisher, and Mr. Salisbury replied that he could not, as he did not know the full Ohristian name of said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fewlass v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Stever v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Calhoun v. F. G. Elliott Hdw. Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API