Thompson v. Ballentine
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
This is a domestic dispute involving a property settlement agreement which was made part of a family court order. We reverse.
FACTS
The parties in this case were divorced on November 7, 1986. At the hearing, a settlement agreement was read into the record and became part of the Order. Pursuant to this agreement and Order, Respondent (Mr. Thompson) was to continue to maintain and enjoy ownership of a membership in the River Hills Country Club (“the Club”).
The portion of the Order dealing with the Country Club membership reads:(f) The parties agree to continue the River Hills…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cox v. LunsfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- Peake v. PeakeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985