Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Ballentine

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 15, 1989No. 23015Published

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

This is a domestic dispute involving a property settlement agreement which was made part of a family court order. We reverse.

FACTS

The parties in this case were divorced on November 7, 1986. At the hearing, a settlement agreement was read into the record and became part of the Order. Pursuant to this agreement and Order, Respondent (Mr. Thompson) was to continue to maintain and enjoy ownership of a membership in the River Hills Country Club (“the Club”).

The portion of the Order dealing with the Country Club membership reads:(f) The parties agree to continue the River Hills…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cox v. LunsfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  2. Peake v. PeakeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API