Legal Opinion

Salazar v. Butler Binion

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1992No. A14-92-00490-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEARS, Justice.

This is an appeal from an amended Order of Dismissal. In three points of error, appellant contends that the Court abused its discretion by vacating its original order and entering a new one. We affirm.

Plaintiff, Butler & Binion, sued Xerox Corporation, Homer Salazar and Lawrence A. Wheeler for entering into unreasonable equipment lease agreements for which Butler & Binion’s costs greatly exceeded the value received. Butler & Binion settled with Xerox Corporation and Lawrence Wheeler. On February 12, 1992, Butler & Binion filed a motion requesting the Court to dismiss the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Transamerican Leasing Co. v. Three Bears, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McClendon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  3. Price v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitaker, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1991
  5. Bryan v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API