Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitaker

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided August 23, 1991No. 12-91-00199-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original mandamus proceeding which arises out of the trial court’s order granting real party in interest Gerald J. Taylor’s amended motion to reinstate his case following Taylor’s voluntary nonsuit of the case. Relator herein seeks leave to file its petition for writ of mandamus to vacate the trial court’s order of reinstatement. Because we find that appellant has an adequate remedy at law, we will overrule relator’s motion for leave to file its petition.

Mandamus will lie only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imposed by law when there is no adequate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cecil v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Champion International Corp. v. Twelfth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Johnson v. Court of Civil AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. QUANTO INTERN. CO., INC. v. Lloyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Hjalmarson v. Langley, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1992
  3. Alvarado v. Hyundai Motor Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  4. Merrill Lynch Relocation Management, Inc. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Kvanvig v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API