Legal Opinion

Northridge Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 12, 1996No. 95-1193, 95-2035PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchudson, J.

W. R. Grace & Company (Grace) appeals from the trial court's denial of its post-verdict motions for judgment or, in the alternative, for a new trial. Northridge Company, Southridge Company, their individual partners, and the Taubman Realty Group Limited Partnership (collectively, "Northridge") cross-appeal from the trial court's reduction of the verdict by twenty percent. Northridge also cross-appeals from the trial court's order denying photocopying costs, double costs, and pre-verdict interest.

*272On the appeal, we affirm on all issues. On the cross-appeal, we reverse in part, concluding that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Northridge Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,525 City of Greenville, and Greenville Water System v. W.R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Prosser v. LeuckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Parks Hiway Enterprises, LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re StarLink Corn Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  4. Pachowitz v. LeDouxCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  5. In re Chinese Drywall CasesNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API