Pace v. Beckett
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action to recover for services rendered in connection with farm cropping contract. Judgment for plaintiffs. Error to the District Court of La Plata County, Hon. W. N: Searcy, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
It appears from the pleadings and the evidence in this case that on or about February 10, 1914, the defendants below, who owned a tract of land, entered into an oral contract with plaintiffs below, with reference to carrying on farming on the land. By the terms of the agreement the defendants were to furnish the grain necessary to seed the ground, and machinery; the plaintiffs were to do the work of farming, including the irrigation of the land, and were to receive one-half of everything that was raised; and the defendant A. L. Pace was to show the plaintiffs “about irrigating” and how and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Lavelle v. Town of JulesburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Warner v. AbbeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Bowers v. Graves & Vinton Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Porter v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Devereaux Mortgage Co. v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Devereaux Mortgage Co. v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1928