Legal Opinion

Schroyer v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1839PublishedCited by 14 opinions

THE plaintiff brought an action on the case, in the district court of Allegheny county, against the defendant, as postmaster of the office in Pittsburg, for the loss óf a letter containing 650 dollars in bank notes, put into the office by his agent in Shanesville, Ohio, and directed to him at New Berlin, Pennsylvania.

Read the full summary

THE plaintiff brought an action on the case, in the district court of Allegheny county, against the defendant, as postmaster of the office in Pittsburg, for the loss óf a letter containing 650 dollars in bank notes, put into the office by his agent in Shanesville, Ohio, and directed to him at New Berlin, Pennsylvania. The declaration contained averments that the letter was mailed at the office in Shanesville, and received for distribution at the office in Pittsburg, by the regular course of the mail; and that it was the defendant’s duty to have caused it to be maijed again for the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Kennedy, J.

This action, it must be observed, is not against the postmaster-general, but against a deputy, appointed by him to attend to the discharge of the duties appertaining to the post-office located and kept in the city of Pittsburg. Deputy postmasters have nothing to do with the carrying of the mail, by means of which letters, packets, &c., are conveyed and transmitted throughout the Union. The carriers of the mails are not employed by them; nor have they any authority or control whatever over the carriers. The duty of a deputy postmaster is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. DenisonNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Orris v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Boyd v. Insurance Patrol of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Foster v. M. A. Metts & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Bankers' Mutual Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. RY. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API