Legal Opinion
In Re Steck
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 9, 2003No. 19-12036PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOVALYN L. WINFIELD, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter was brought before the Court by Danna Steck (“Debtor”) on a motion to reduce or modify the secured proof of claim filed by WAMCO XXV, Ltd. (“WAMCO”), a judgment creditor of the Debtor. The Debtor also requested relief from certain portions of a consent order to which she and WAMCO had agreed. On the return date of the motion it became apparent that the Debtor was contending that WAMCO was not a secured creditor because its judgment lien could be avoided either pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 544 or § 522(f). The Court required…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Einoder v. Mount Greenwood Bank (In Re Einoder)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Funches v. Household Finance Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Funches)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Myers v. Raynor (In Re Raynor)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Ryker v. Current (In Re Ryker)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- In Re HannahUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- In re ArnoldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.