Mitchell v. Wisconsin
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
I
A
In Birchfield v. North Dakota , 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2160, 195 L.Ed.2d 560 (2016), we recounted the country's efforts over the years to address the terrible problem of drunk driving. Today, "all States have laws that prohibit motorists from driving with a [BAC] that exceeds a specified level." Id. , at ----, 136 S.Ct., at 2166. And to help enforce BAC limits, every State has passed what are popularly called implied-consent laws. Ibid. As "a condition of the privilege of" using the public roads, these laws require that drivers submit to BAC testing "when there is sufficient reason to…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Tyquan Stewart v. Parkview HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- People v. EubanksIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. Bell, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- State v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
- Fuld v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.