Borgren v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to alter or amend the judgment which this court entered on June 30, 1989, reported at 716 F.Supp. 1378 (D.Kan. 1989). First, defendant seeks to amend the judgment by eliminating the $200,000 award for loss of consortium. Defendant argues that plaintiff did not request damages for loss of consortium in her administrative claim, and that her husband did not sign the administrative claim or submit his own claim for loss of consortium.
Defendant cites three cases which deny loss of consortium damages…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roberson v. CounselmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Hoffman v. DautelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Boody v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Borgren v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Focke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. State Dept. of Health & Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Rode v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Weymers v. KheraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- Bointy-Tsotigh v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.