Legal Opinion

Randall v. Randall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 12, 1916No. Nos.19,859—(57)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the municipal court of St. Paúl to recover $109.50. Prom an order, Boemer, J., granting defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment entered by default and granting defendant the right to a trial on the merits, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

This action was brought in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover the sum of $109.50. Defendant appeared and interposed an answer to the complaint, and the cause was set for trial before the court without a jury on June 30, 1915. Defendant failed to appear at the trial, plaintiff submitted her evidence, and on July -19, 1915, the court made its findings ordering judgment in her favor for the amount claimed with costs. Notice of taxation of costs was duly given, and judgment *64was formally rendered and entered on July 30. On tbe same day a transcript of the judgment was filed in the office…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Kosloski v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Northwest Holding Co. v. EvansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Slatoski v. JendroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Stromsborg v. StromsborgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API