Legal Opinion

Hamilton Test Systems, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1985No. 15733PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICI, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, Hamilton Test Systems, Inc. (Hamilton), brought suit against the defendant, the City of Albuquerque (the City), in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico for money which Hamilton claims it is owed on a contract with the City. The United States District Court certified to this Court the following question of New Mexico law:

By entering into the contract with Hamilton * * * as described in the * * * [parties’] Stipulation of Facts, did the City * * * “contract any debt” within the meaning of Article IX, Section 12, of the New…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lanigan v. Town of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People Ex Rel. Adamowski v. Public Building CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. MacOn Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Snow Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  4. Chapman v. LunaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Palmer v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schlieter v. CarlosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wilschinsky Ex Rel. Wilschinsky v. MedinaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wilschinsky Ex Rel. Wilschinsky v. MedinaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API