Legal Opinion

Wilschinsky Ex Rel. Wilschinsky v. Medina

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1989No. 17658Published

1Opinion of the Court

775 P.2d 713 (1989)

108 N.M. 511

Tui WILSCHINSKY, Irene Rokstad Wilschinsky, in their own behalf and as Parents and next friends of Zoe Wilschinsky, Taflyn Wilschinsky, and Tara Rokstad, Plaintiffs,

v.

Helen MEDINA and Michael Straight, M.D., Defendants.

No. 17658.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

June 29, 1989.

Stephen Durkovich, Albuquerque, for plaintiffs.

Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A. and W. Mark Mowery, Santa Fe, for defendant, Medina.

Campbell & Black, P.A., John H. Bemis and Bradford C. Berge, Santa Fe, for defendant, Straight.

Hatch, Beitler, Allen & Shepherd, P.A. and Phyllis A. Dow,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Scarborough; Dissent · Scarborough.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Durflinger v. ArtilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Schear v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Town of Scituate v. O'ROURKESupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API