Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. District Court for Colorado's Seventeenth Judicial District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 20, 1987No. 86SA58Published

1DissentVollack, Justice

The majority opinion recognizes that the types of protective orders specifically described in section 19-3-110(2), 8B C.R.S. (1986), do not expressly encompass the type of order entered here. I agree. The majority, however, next reasons that the requirement in section 19-3-111, that the court order an appropriate treatment plan, implicitly authorizes the court to issue such orders as are reasonably necessary to implement that mandate, including the issuance of protective orders under section 19-3-110(2) prohibiting certain district attorneys and police officers from questioning employees of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People in Interest of CSMSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API