Legal Opinion

People in Interest of CSM

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 19, 1977No. 27509PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan

The district court, acting in its capacity as a juvenile court, issued a protective order against V.D., a seventeen-year-old girl, prohibiting her from associating with C.S.M., a fifteen-year-old girl. V.D. appeals. We affirm.

At a detention hearing concerning C.S.M., testimony indicated that association with V.D. had been a bad influence on C.S.M. C.S.M.’s probation officer had attempted to terminate the girls’ relationship by including a non-fraternization provision in C.S.M.’s probation order. When that proved ineffective, the juvenile court issued the protective order here challenged. V.D.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Dickson v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. Gina M. Childs v. Robert A. Ballou Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  3. People v. District Court for Colorado's Seventeenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. People v. DISTRICT COURT FOR 17TH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. People v. District Court for Colorado's Seventeenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API