Ballew v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George K. Cracraft, Judge.
Nathan Randy Ballew appeals from his conviction of murder in the second degree contending only that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a finding of guilt. Although the appellant did not move for a directed verdict or otherwise preserve the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence in the trial court, the attorney general, relying upon Ply v. State, 270 Ark. 554, 606 S.W.2d 556 (1980), has agreed in his brief that the issue is properly before this court because it is a matter that may be raised for the first time on appeal. We do not agree that Ply is controlling,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Ply v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Eskew v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Janes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988