Legal Opinion

Janes v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1985No. CR 84-192PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

At separate trials in municipal court William M. Janes was convicted of DWI, second offense, and Deanna Jesson was convicted of DWI, first offense. On appeal to the circuit court the cases were consolidated and tried together. No witnesses testified, the case being submitted to the trial judge, without a jury, on documentary evidence introduced by the State and on a memorandum brief submitted on behalf of both defendants by their attorney. The court found each defendant guilty and imposed sentences within the limits set by Act 549 of 1983, the Omnibus DWI Act. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Fleming v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Williford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Eskew v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Bishop v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Johnston v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Watson v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Russell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API