Legal Opinion

King v. Township of Leacock

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1989No. Appeal 1103 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Colins,

This case involves the determination of whether the demolition of Jonathan and Sarah Kings (appellants) property is the proper means of abating a public nui sanee. Appellants’ property is located at 188 Maple Street, Gordonville, Pennsylvania, and consists of an uninhabited, two-story frame building on a lot of approximately 13,000 square feet. On May 6, 1987, the Township of Leacock (Township) filed a complaint against appellants charging that their property constituted a public nuisance in violation of Section 2 of the Township’s nuisance ordinance. Appellants failed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Groff v. Borough of SellersvilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Sobocinski v. City of WilliamsportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Miernicki v. SeltzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Herrit v. Code Management Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. City of Erie v. StelmackCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Philadelphia v. CANTEEN, DIV. OF TW SER.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical School Education Ass'n v. Executive Council of the Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical SchoolCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Chase v. Eldred BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API