Legal Opinion

Lotoszinski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1979No. Docket 78-3303Published

1Opinion of the Court

94 Mich. App. 164 (1979)

288 N.W.2d 369

LOTOSZINSKI

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Docket No. 78-3303.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided December 5, 1979.

Stiles, Fowler, Dudley & Tuttle, for plaintiff.

Fraser, Trebilcock, Davis & Foster, for defendant.

Before: DANHOF, C.J., and N.J. KAUFMAN and D.C. RILEY, JJ.

D.C. RILEY, J.

Following an automobile accident, plaintiff sought recovery under the uninsured motorist provisions of policies which plaintiff and her mother held with defendant. Plaintiff requested arbitration on this matter pursuant to the terms of the policy. The arbitrators…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Simonette v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Gorton v. Reliance Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. Brake v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API