Legal Opinion

State v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 30, 1976No. 58710PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

Defendant appeals conviction and sentence upon his plea of guilty to forgery in violation of § 718.1, The Code. He contends the trial court erred in failing to advise him and ensure he understood before acceptance of his guilty plea that the plea operated as a waiver of a pending motion to suppress identification testimony. We affirm the trial court.

The record shows the court conducted a colloquy with defendant prior to acceptance of his guilty plea as required by this court in State v. Sisco, 169 N.W.2d 542 (Iowa 1969), and Brainard v. State, 222 N.W.2d 711 (Iowa 1974).…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. SiscoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Brainard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. State v. WarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Saadiq v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  2. Roberto Morales Diaz v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. State v. ReavesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. State v. HeinenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  5. Amended August 11, 2017 Roberto Morales Diaz v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API