Legal Opinion

State v. Heinen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 20, 1977No. 59770PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

The question in this appeal is whether a judge receiving a guilty plea from a defendant who asserts he was intoxicated at the time of the offense must ascertain the defendant’s awareness of his right at trial to interpose an intoxication defense. We hold such determination by the judge is not a prerequisite to a voluntary and intelligent guilty plea. We affirm the conviction and sentence in this case.

Defendant was originally charged with assault with intent to commit murder in violation of Code § 690.6. The charge was later changed to burglary with aggravation in violation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. William Lee v. Joseph S. Hopper, Warden, Georgia State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. State v. BoothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Young v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. State v. BuhrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. State v. KillpackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Farley v. GlantonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API