Beaulieu v. Beaulieu
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Hale, J., allowing plaintiff’s attorney $250 for services and expenses incurred on her behalf.
1Per curiam
Appeal in a divorce action by defendant from an order allowing the attorney of plaintiff $250 for services and expenses rendered and incurred herein on her behalf. That the services were ren*512dered to enable the plaintiff to commence and prosecute the action, and that the amount allowed is reasonable, is not here controverted; but defendant claims that the court had no jurisdiction to make the order, for the reason that the parties, since the services were rendered, became reconciled and are now living together, and neither desires the further prosecution of the action. Reconciliation of the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Boardman v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Szymanski v. SzymanskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912