Legal Opinion
Emigrant Savings Bank v. Rappaport
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 18, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated August 23, 2004, which granted the motion of S & K Properties, LLC, and Millennium Home & Land, Ltd., the successful bidders at the foreclosure sale, to confirm the foreclosure sale nunc *503pro tunc and to direct the referee to issue to them a referee’s deed.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.
The successful bidders at a foreclosure sale held on September 29, 2003, were S & K Properties, LLC, and Millennium Home & Land, Ltd.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eastern Refractories Co. Inc. v. Forty Eight Insulations Inc. Aycock Inc., Fibrex Inc. And Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- In Re DominguezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Carr v. McGriffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Homeside Lending, Inc. v. WattsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Yen-Ching Chen v. DickersonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
- Asset Data Corp. v. MassaroNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A. v. Wen ZhouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- W. Rogowski Farm, LLC v. County of OrangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019