Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnny Edward Hodge, Linda S. Jones and James A. Herrin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 28, 1979No. 78-1532, 78-1568 and 78-1569PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.

The two major issues in this appeal are the effect of Rakas v. Illinois, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978) upon standing to raise Fourth Amendment rights and our declination to adopt a per se rule that contingent fee arrangements with informants are invalid.

I

In the middle of September, 1977, the Drug Enforcement Administration employed Karl Hobbs as a confidential informant. Shortly thereafter Hobbs contacted his second cousin, defendant James Herrin, in regard to the possible purchase of drugs. In the meetings which followed, Hobbs was customarily searched…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Calixto Agapito, Martha Calderon and Horacio RuedaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Adalberto Cervantes-Pacheco, Jerry Wayne Nelson and William E. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Raymond E. KaminskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Lawhorn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API