Lawhorn v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PIVARNIK, Justice.
Defendants-Appellants William Lawhorn and Cecil Cox were found guilty by a jury in the Bartholomew Superior Court of dealing in cocaine, a class A felony. The trial judge sentenced each to a term of thirty years. Appellants now directly . appeal. The first issue presented for our consideration claims that the trial court erred by sentencing Appellants on a class A felony rather than on a class B felony due to the actual weight of pure cocaine delivered. This is the only issue raised by Appellant Cox. Appellant Lawhorn raised this issue and also presented several other…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pavone v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Tinnin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. GoetzMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Steckel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Wisehart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Snellgrove v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.