Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1983)

Missouri Attorney General Reports

Decided October 27, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Secretary Kirkpatrick:

This opinion is rendered in response to your questions asking:

1. Is the use of an "executing witness" as provided in Section 486.340 RSMo proper and legal in the notarization of a voted absentee ballot, instead of the use of a "notary public" or other "officer authorized by law to administer oaths" as required in Section 115.291 RSMo?

2. If the answer to question one is "yes" what application should be given to Section 115.637(10) RSMo [sic] which indicates that it is a class four election offense for "any person having in his possession any official ballot, except…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Memphis v. HackmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. State Ex Rel. Dreer v. Public School Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. Garzee v. SauroSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. In re the Contest of RodriguezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Redman v. St. Joseph Hay & Grain Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API